The philentropy package has several mechanisms to calculate distances between probability density functions. The main one is to use the the distance() function, which enables to compute 46 different distances/similarities between probability density functions (see ?philentropy::distance and a companion vignette for details). Alternatively, it is possible to call each distance/dissimilarity function directly. For example, the euclidean() function will compute the euclidean distance, while jaccard - the Jaccard distance. The complete list of available distance measures are available with the philentropy::getDistMethods() function.

Both of the above approaches have their pros and cons. The distance() function is more flexible as it allows users to use any distance measure and can return either a matrix or a dist object. It also has several defensive programming checks implemented, and thus, it is more appropriate for regular users. Single distance functions, such as euclidean() or jaccard(), can be, on the other hand, slightly faster as they directly call the underlining C++ code.

Now, we introduce three new low-level functions that are intermediaries between distance() and single distance functions. They are fairly flexible, allowing to use of any implemented distance measure, but also usually faster than calling the distance() functions (especially, if it is needed to use many times). These functions are:

  • dist_one_one() - expects two vectors (probability density functions), returns a single value
  • dist_one_many() - expects one vector (a probability density function) and one matrix (a set of probability density functions), returns a vector of values
  • dist_many_many() - expects two matrices (two sets of probability density functions), returns a matrix of values

Let’s start testing them by attaching the philentropy package.

dist_one_one()

dist_one_one() is a lower level equivalent to distance(). However, instead of accepting a numeric data.frame or matrix, it expects two vectors representing probability density functions. In this example, we create two vectors, P and Q.

P <- 1:10 / sum(1:10)
Q <- 20:29 / sum(20:29)

To calculate the euclidean distance between them we can use several approaches - (a) build-in R dist() function, (b) philentropy::distance(), (c) philentropy::euclidean(), or the new dist_one_one().

# install.packages("microbenchmark")
microbenchmark::microbenchmark(
  dist(rbind(P, Q), method = "euclidean"),
  distance(rbind(P, Q), method = "euclidean", test.na = FALSE, mute.message = TRUE),
  euclidean(P, Q, FALSE),
  dist_one_one(P, Q, method = "euclidean", testNA = FALSE)
)
## Warning in microbenchmark::microbenchmark(dist(rbind(P, Q), method =
## "euclidean"), : less accurate nanosecond times to avoid potential integer
## overflows
## Unit: nanoseconds
##                                                                                    expr
##                                                 dist(rbind(P, Q), method = "euclidean")
##  distance(rbind(P, Q), method = "euclidean", test.na = FALSE,      mute.message = TRUE)
##                                                                  euclidean(P, Q, FALSE)
##                                dist_one_one(P, Q, method = "euclidean", testNA = FALSE)
##   min   lq     mean median    uq    max neval
##  6232 6683  8489.87   6970  7216 144853   100
##  9266 9881 16504.96  10127 10496 627382   100
##   574  615  1068.05    656   779  36531   100
##   902 1025  1340.29   1107  1189  20746   100

All of them return the same, single value. However, as you can see in the benchmark above, some are more flexible, and others are faster.

dist_one_many()

The role of dist_one_many() is to calculate distances between one probability density function (in a form of a vector) and a set of probability density functions (as rows in a matrix).

Firstly, let’s create our example data.

set.seed(2020-08-20)
P <- 1:10 / sum(1:10)
M <- t(replicate(100, sample(1:10, size = 10) / 55))

P is our input vector and M is our input matrix.

Distances between the P vector and probability density functions in M can be calculated using several approaches. For example, we could write a for loop (adding a new code) or just use the existing distance() function and extract only one row (or column) from the results. The dist_one_many() allows for this calculation directly as it goes through each row in M and calculates a given distance measure between P and values in this row.

# install.packages("microbenchmark")
microbenchmark::microbenchmark(
  as.matrix(dist(rbind(P, M), method = "euclidean"))[1, ][-1],
  distance(rbind(P, M), method = "euclidean", test.na = FALSE, mute.message = TRUE)[1, ][-1],
  dist_one_many(P, M, method = "euclidean", testNA = FALSE)
)
## Unit: microseconds
##                                                                                             expr
##                                      as.matrix(dist(rbind(P, M), method = "euclidean"))[1, ][-1]
##  distance(rbind(P, M), method = "euclidean", test.na = FALSE,      mute.message = TRUE)[1, ][-1]
##                                        dist_one_many(P, M, method = "euclidean", testNA = FALSE)
##       min       lq       mean    median        uq       max neval
##    98.605  113.570  131.39516  124.1480  144.5045   235.914   100
##  7580.367 8021.588 8546.28272 8299.1380 9249.8460 10280.217   100
##    10.086   11.562   14.45168   13.8785   15.6620    56.867   100

The dist_one_many() returns a vector of values. It is, in this case, much faster than distance(), and visibly faster than dist() while allowing for more possible distance measures to be used.

dist_many_many()

dist_many_many() calculates distances between two sets of probability density functions (as rows in two matrix objects).

Let’s create two new matrix example data.

set.seed(2020-08-20)
M1 <- t(replicate(10, sample(1:10, size = 10) / 55))
M2 <- t(replicate(10, sample(1:10, size = 10) / 55))

M1 is our first input matrix and M2 is our second input matrix. I am not aware of any function build-in R that allows calculating distances between rows of two matrices, and thus, to solve this problem, we can create our own - many_dists()

many_dists = function(m1, m2){
  r = matrix(nrow = nrow(m1), ncol = nrow(m2))
  for (i in seq_len(nrow(m1))){
    for (j in seq_len(nrow(m2))){
      x = rbind(m1[i, ], m2[j, ])
      r[i, j] = distance(x, method = "euclidean", mute.message = TRUE)
    }
  }
  r
}

… and compare it to dist_many_many().

# install.packages("microbenchmark")
microbenchmark::microbenchmark(
  many_dists(M1, M2),
  dist_many_many(M1, M2, method = "euclidean", testNA = FALSE)
)
## Unit: microseconds
##                                                          expr     min        lq
##                                            many_dists(M1, M2) 953.455 1017.5585
##  dist_many_many(M1, M2, method = "euclidean", testNA = FALSE)  15.785   17.0765
##        mean   median       uq      max neval
##  1193.19717 1054.418 1135.003 4861.534   100
##    20.65908   18.204   21.156   80.647   100

Both many_dists()and dist_many_many() return a matrix. The above benchmark concludes that dist_many_many() is about 30 times faster than our custom many_dists() approach.